Building Capability, Capacity, and Readiness for Change

A Global Energy Company | Middle East

The Context

A Global Energy Company was entering the next phase of a large-scale procurement transformation tied to
its long-term strategy.

Leadership wanted an unfiltered view of what was actually happening on the ground, not just what
dashboards and KPIs suggested.

Hive Partners was asked to listen deeply, independently, and across levels to assess Capability, Capacity,
and Readiness for Change (CCR) before moving forward.

The Approach

  • 111 one-to-one, in-person conversations across headquarters and multiple operating companies

  • Participants ranged from CEOs and SVPs to VPs, managers, and frontline procurement professionals across multiple operating companies

  • No pre-work. No scripts. Conversations were designed to surface both what was said and what wasn’t

  • Feedback was parsed into 2,132 discrete data points and coded across CCR dimensions, categories, and subcategories

What We Heard (At a Glance)

From Procurement

  • Pride in the mission, paired with frustration in execution

  • A strong understanding at the individual level of what transformation requires, yet a belief that the organization itself was not set up to deliver

  • Repeated tension between process and outcomes, and between KPIs and real business value

  • A desire to be seen and to operate as a strategic partner, not a transactional function

From Stakeholders

  • Direct, candid feedback on pain points and genuine support for procurement’s success

  • Clear signals that procurement was not consistently “speaking the language of the business”

  • Concern that standardization and process rigidity were limiting agility, innovation, and value creation

  • A strong appetite to be involved earlier in strategy, design, and planning

What the Data Revealed

  • A clear gap between individual capability and organizational performance

  • Alignment surfaced as the most frequently cited issue across all conversations

  • Leadership, change management, communication, and commercial acumen were consistently rated as weak at the organizational level

  • A “one-size-fits-all” approach was repeatedly called out as ineffective across diverse operating contexts 

Core Takeaways

  • Transformation cannot be sustained without a shared mission, vision, and strategy that cascades across the enterprise

  • Change was often experienced as mandated rather than understood, leading to fatigue rather than commitment

  • Leadership behaviors were not consistently aligned with the expectations placed on teams

  • Talent existed across the system, but silos, false narratives, and limited recognition muted its impact

  • Communication skewed heavily toward the “how,” while the “why” was often missing

The Path Forward (High Level)

  • Establish a clearly defined procurement mission, operating model, and strategic priorities aligned to enterprise goals

  • Invest in leadership capability, not just technical expertise, to lead through continuous change

  • Shift procurement from a process-first mindset to an outcomes-driven, customer-centric model

  • Build disciplined change management and communication as core competencies, not afterthoughts

  • Treat culture as an outcome of behavior and execution, not a standalone initiative

Why This Matters

This work gave leaders a grounded, human view of where the organization was truly ready and where it wasn’t — not to slow transformation down, but to ensure the next phase was built on clarity, trust, and shared ownership rather than assumptions.

That’s where real change starts. 

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Let’s talk.

Alex Calicchia

Chief Hiveologist™ and CEO

Book a Meeting with Alex